Archive for the Who's In Charge? Category

A Follow Up

Posted in Who's In Charge? on Friday 2 October 2009 by Mikki

I was responding on Facebook to Facebook comments to my last post, but it is not easy to type there. It is much easier for me to create a post in my word processing program already set to post directly to my blog, which then posts to Facebook. I am a social networking fiend.

Besides, this software has a better spell check and thesaurus.

Adding to my health care debate were Sister; employed, insured, but in a financial quagmire from co-pays and insurance deductibles after surgery, and Cousin; employed (in the health care field), insured, willing to barter for services. They provided the ammo to the gist of my argument.

In an unsubtle segue I heard today that the FDIC is running out of money. In case you do not know, the “I” in FDIC stands for “Insurance”. Because so many banks are failing, the FDIC is losing money on two fronts; outgoing claims and incoming premiums – with 100 banks failing this year alone, those 100 banks’ depositor funds have to be covered and those same 100 banks are no longer paying insurance premiums.

Because the “F” in FDIC stands for “Federal” (although I can think of other things), this news is not the disaster it could be. The FDIC is backed by the full faith of the US Government, with which they have a 500 billion dollar line of credit. But, in an attempt not to use that line of credit, the FDIC is raising the surviving banks’ premiums. They actually would like banks to pay for 3 full years of premiums upfront, but that’s another story.

This exact scenario is what I feel is going to happen to the health insurance industry. Minus the 500 billion dollar credit line, of course. As more people lose their jobs and insurance, as more companies pull back on health insurance benefits, leaving people un or under insured, insurance companies are going to have to charge the existing American clients more for premiums if they want to stay in business. Already, insurance clients pay for those that are un- or under-insured. After all, these companies are not in the business of insurance to help people, but to make money.

If insurance rates continue to rise (or, if coverage is reduced or both), more people will drop their insurance. This could circle back to higher rates (or less coverage) for an ever-decreasing group of policyholders.

I do not think that it is a “right” for every American to have health insurance simply because they are American. What I do believe is that a nation as advanced and as wealthy as ours should provide basic coverage to all its citizens simply because it is the right thing to do.

Even if it means paying for people who abuse the system and their bodies.

Even if it means paying for people with bad genetics.

Even if it means paying for people who will never use it.

Otherwise, we might as well be a 3rd World country. You know, those countries where diseases spread unchecked, where children starve, where death and poverty are commonplace.

I would be glad to contribute to health care costs, just as I contribute to K-12 education, just as I contribute to the protection of my home, life and country. I have no children, yet I pay taxes pay so others’ children can be educated. My house has never caught on fire, nor has a crime been committed in it, nor has a rogue militant force ever invaded it, yet I pay for all these services.

If I were back working in Corporate America, under a Universal Health Care system, they could either save the money they’d be paying for my insurance, or give me a raise to cover my increased taxes. Either way, they would be more profitable and therefore more competitive. Plus, I would not be forced to stay in a dead end, lousy, or miserable job just because of the health care benefits.

Personally, I’m all for Universal Health Care, Medicare for All, Government Sponsored, Socialist/Communist/Fascist medicine, or whatever you want to call it. I would like to be able to use health care services (or not) and not worry about the cost, just as I can use the police service (or not) without a worry as to cost. I would like to see EVERYONE be able to use health care services.

Well, except for members of Congress.

Reform

Posted in Who's In Charge? on Wednesday 30 September 2009 by Mikki

(verb) to change and improve something by correcting faults, removing inconsistencies and abuses, and imposing modern methods or values

Okay, I’m completely over the Health Care Debate. The information is so convoluted that it is impossible to understand the pros and cons.

How do I see it?

As two separate issues. One is Health Insurance, the other is Health Care. Health Insurance is defined as protection against loss due to ill health for which a premium is paid. Health Care is defined as the preservation of mental and physical health by preventing or treating illness through services offered by the health profession

It’s not Health Care that’s run amok. Any one, at any time, can seek medical attention for whatever ails them. There are plenty of doctors, hospitals and emergency rooms. The difficulties enter with the paying for the services, and the secondary costs that accrue during any possible rehabilitation.

In a utopian world, a person who sustains an injury would be rushed to the hospital for treatment, cared for during months of rehabilitation, while their household and other living expenses are paid for, until such a time they can resume with their responsibilities. Here in Mikutopia no doctors make mistakes, no one takes advantage of the system and everyone recovers to live happily ever after.

And here is where utopia comes to a screeching halt.

Mr. Jekyll decides to go to med school with the altruistic desire to learn as much about medicine as humanly possible to help those that need it most. After incurring a bazillion dollar debt, Mr. is now Dr. and is ready to hang out his shingle. One day, Dr. J heals a patient who is less than pleased with the results. Dr. J, cleared of any wrongdoing watches helplessly as his mal-practice premiums go up anyhow. Needing not only to pay off student loans but also to meet an unrealistic overhead, he has no choice but to raise his rates.

Insure-Is-Us Inc opens its doors. Its corporate mission is to provide protection against loss due to ill health for anyone that can pay for it. Strong bottom line, strong business. Weak bottom line, no business. Survival of the fittest. If they pay out more benefits than premiums collected, well then, so long, farewell, auf weidersehen, good night. While the public corporate mission remains unchanged, the private statement changes to protect that bottom line at all costs! Preexisting conditions, experimental treatment, out of network, unnecessary treatment, paperwork snafu – whatever it takes!

Johnny McD decides at the tender age of five that fruits and veggies suck. So does exercise. Pop tarts, ice cream and brownies RULE! Xbox, Playstation and Gameboy are COOL! Obesity is the rage. Type II diabetes is king! High score on the high blood pressure cuff! Johnny becomes John, and suffers gallbladder issues, joint issues, breathing issues, cholesterol issues. Now he needs a quick fix. Pills and surgery are the answer! Wahoo for health insurance!

My opinion? Leave it alone. It seems to be in such a state of disrepair that it shouldn’t be long before the whole thing collapses all together.

Obstruction

Posted in Who's In Charge? on Wednesday 6 May 2009 by Mikki

Obstruction is the act of:

  1. A defensive player or team member that hinders or prevents a batter from striking or hitting a pitched ball.
  2. A fielder who impedes the progress of a runner or batter-runner who is legally running bases while:
    1. not in possession of the ball, or
    2. not in the act of fielding a batted ball, or
    3. Making a fake tag without the ball, or
    4. In possession of the ball and who pushes a runner off a base, or
    5. In possession of the ball, but not in the act of making a play on the runner which intentionally impedes the progress of that runner, while he is legally running the bases.

For those of you who’ve been asking why I was ejected and suspended for one game in my co-ed softball, here’s the skinny…as only I can tell it :-) .

Only our second game of the 2009 spring season, and we were playing with eight players. A strategy in place, we had a “roving” second baseman, who was playing a deep 2nd, or a shallow right field. Other players filled in at whatever position they felt comfortable. There wasn’t much chance of winning the game, or even a chance it would be a close game, but the eight that were there were there already and we wanted to play.

It’s frustrating to play shorthanded not only because there’s more territory and position to cover, but also because any mistake made is amplified. And if the other team is worth their salt, they’re going to take advantage of every opportunity.

So it was worse when the frustration was caused not by fielding mistakes, nor a ruthless opponent, but by an umpire who played by his own rules.

The first incident was a force play at second. With the throw coming in to second base, our basemen lined up for the play at 2. Our player tagged the player as he reached the base, and turned to look for a possible throw to first, but the ump called the runner safe. When I mentioned to the umpire that we play with a slide or avoid rule, he told me that the player did not have to either slide or get out of the way, but instead the second baseman had to get out of the runners way. He called the runner safe due to obstruction.

The second incident was an attempted double play with another force play at second and a tag at home. Again, the second baseman was called for obstruction and the play at home denied. The second baseman had her foot on the bag long enough only to make the play, and then threw to the catcher. The catcher had her right foot on the left (3rd base) side of the plate and she tagged the runners foot when he slid into her foot. The runner at home was called safe. When questioned about his calls, he stated that at no time, in softball, could a fielder obstruct a base.

We have some rules specifically geared towards safety. We’re not professional ball players after all. For instance, we have two first bases. One inside the line and white, and one outside the line and orange. Runners get orange, fielders get white. We also have to slide or get out of the way when running to second or third. Sometimes, we have an “in the neighborhood” rule if the bases are slick from the night dew.

But, if the baseman has to yield the base to the runner, then what is the sense of having basemen? Why have anyone play? Why not just flip a coin at the beginning of the game to determine the winner then all head out for pizza and beer?

Aggravated beyond my normal scope of fair play, feeling my sarcastic self gearing up for battle, we headed into the top of the last inning. With our first two batters out, down by enough for the mercy rule to kick in, just about out of time, our third batter was called out on a throw to first.

In an ordinary game, a completely legitimate play. An end to a game. Infield hit to 3rd, throw to 1 for the out. If we had a score book, it would be written as 6-3 and have another 3 with a circle around it to indicate the out.

But of course…

“WHAT!!!???” I yelled from the coach’s box. “How can the runner be out?!!? The baseman’s foot was ON the bag! Isn’t that OBSTRUCTION?” For which I was ejected and suspended for one game.